文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：公益事业单位的数据权益保护探讨

英文题名：Discussion on the Protection of Data Rights and Interests of Public Welfare Institutions

作者：张一博[1];刘澍[2]

机构：[1]中央财经大学法学院;[2]广东海洋大学法政学院

年份：2022

卷号：42

期号：4

起止页码：96

中文期刊名：图书馆论坛

外文期刊名：Library Tribune

收录：CSTPCD、、国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库、北大核心、CSSCI、北大核心2020、CSSCI2021_2022

基金：安徽省高校优秀人才支持计划项目“人民法院司法改革的广度与强度研究”(项目编号:gxyqZD2017053)研究成果。

语种：中文

中文关键词：公益事业单位;数据权益;赋权保护模式;行为保护模式

外文关键词：public welfare institutions;data rights;empowerment protection;behavior protection

中文摘要：学术界在数据权益保护方案上存在激烈的争论,主要有以所有权论、知识产权论、商业秘密论等为代表的赋权保护模式,以利用权体系论、数据有限排他论和用益权论为代表的行为保护模式。但无论是何种模式,公益事业单位的数据权益均被忽视。实际上,数据是表现信息的介质而非载体,公益性是其本质属性;数据赋权无法从法理上得到证立,更容易造成数据权益保护的非平衡性。实务中,合同法保护方案不仅切实可行,而且能够满足各方主体数据权益保护的需求。

外文摘要：There have been intense debates on data rights protection schemes in academic community. Focus of discussion is mainly reflected in empowerment protection model represented by theories of ownership,intellectual properties,trade secrets,and in behavior protection model represented by theories of utilization rights,limited data exclusivity and usufruct. Regardless of these models,data rights of public welfare institutions are overlooked.In fact, data is a medium of information, not a carrier;and public welfare is its essential attribute. If data empowerment cannot be justified legally,it would likely cause disequilibrium in the protection of data rights. In day-to-day practice,contract law protection plans are not only workable,but also able to meet the needs of data rights protection and interests of all parties.