文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：数字经济赋能制造业与生产性服务业融合:理论机制与经验证据

英文题名：Digital Economy Empowering the Integration of Manufacturing and Producer Services:Theoretical Mechanisms and Empirical Evidence

作者：周昌仕[1];李菲菲[1];高秀丽[1]

机构：[1]广东海洋大学管理学院,广东湛江524088

年份：2025

卷号：25

期号：12

起止页码：52

中文期刊名：创新科技

外文期刊名：Innovation science and technology

基金：广东省哲学社会科学规划项目“粤港澳大湾区生产性服务业与制造业高质量发展的协同演化机制研究”(GD20CYJ15);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“我国生产性服务业与制造业高质量发展的协同演化机制与路径研究”(21YJC790058)。

语种：中文

中文关键词：数字经济;新质生产力;产业融合;制造业;生产性服务业;异质性;空间溢出效应

外文关键词：digital economy;newquality productiveforces;industrial integration;manufacturing;producer services;heterogeneity;spatial spillover effects

中文摘要：随着新一轮科技革命和产业变革的深入推进,制造业与生产性服务业的深度融合成为经济高质量发展的重要路径。引入新质生产力作为中介变量,基于“数字经济—新质生产力—两业融合”理论框架,运用2012—2022年省级面板数据,从数字技术、数据要素和数字市场3个维度构建数字经济测度体系,实证检验数字经济对两业融合的影响,以及新质生产力的中介作用。研究发现:数字经济显著提升了两业融合程度,其中数据要素的作用最强,数字技术次之,数字市场最弱;数字经济可以通过提高新质生产力发展水平间接推动两业融合深化;异质性分析结果表明,数字经济对两业融合的赋能效应在东部地区表现得更加显著;空间效应检验进一步揭示,数字经济对两业融合具有显著的正向空间溢出效应。基于上述实证结果,提出如下建议:强化数据要素引领,推动区域协同与差异化布局,加快新质生产力培育。

外文摘要：With the deep advancement of a new round of technological revolution and industrial transformation,the deep integration of manufacturing and producer services has become a key pathway to promote high-quality economic development.Based on panel data from 31 Chinese provinces from 2012 to 2022,this study constructs a measurement system for digital economy development level from three dimensions:digital technology,data elements,and digital markets,evaluated comprehensively using the entropy weight method.The integration level is measured using a coupling coordination degree model across four aspects-industrial scale,efficiency,potential,and constraints-through ten indicators.New quality productive forces are assessed via a multi-indicator evaluation system constructed from four dimensions:new-type laborers,new-type means of labor,new-type subjects of labor,and optimized factor combinations.By employing bidirectional fixed-effects models,mediation effect models,and spatial econometric models,this paper empirically tests the direct impact of the digital economy on the integration of the two industries,the mediating role of new quality productive forces,and its spatial spillover effects.The results indicate:①The digital economy significantly promotes the integration of manufacturing and producer services,with data elements having the strongest effect,followed by digital technology,and digital markets having a relatively weaker impact.②New quality productive forces play a significant partial mediating role between the digital economy and industrial integration,accounting for 49.91%of the total effect.The digital economy fosters the digital transformation of laborers,the intelligentization of means of labor,the servitization of subjects of labor,and the optimization of factor combinations,thereby promoting deeper integration ③Regional heterogeneity analysis shows that the promoting effect of the digital economy on integration is most significant in the eastern region,while it is not significant in the central,western.and northeastern regions.④Spatial effect tests reveal a significant positive spatial correlation in industrial integration.The digital economy exhibits positive spatial spillover effects on neighboring regions,particularly evident under adjacency and economic distance matrices.This research provides new theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence for understanding industrial integration mechanisms in the digital economy era.Finally,based on the findings,policy recommendations are proposed in four areas:First,focus on data elements as the core to break down data circulation barriers.Second,implement regionally differentiated strategies-strengthening platform ecosystems in the east while improving digital infrastructure in the central and western regions.Third,vigorously cultivate new quality productive forces by enhancing digital skills training and promoting intelligent equipment.Fourth,establish cross-regional collaboration mechanisms based on spatial spillover effects,particularly by increasing support for digital infrastructure in the central,western,and northeastern regions.