文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：中国的全球价值链地位与外部失衡:附加值贸易关系网络的视角

英文题名：China's Position in Global Value Chains and External Imbalances:A Study from Perspective of Value-added Trade Nets

作者：廖泽芳[1,2];毛伟[1]

机构：[1]广东海洋大学经济管理学院;[2]广东海洋大学东盟研究院

年份：2015

期号：12

起止页码：27

中文期刊名：国际贸易问题

外文期刊名：Journal of International Trade

收录：CSTPCD、、国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库、北大核心2014、CSSCI2014_2016、北大核心、社科基金资助期刊、CSSCI

基金：教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(14YJA790027);广东海洋大学自然科学基金项目(C14518);广东海洋大学创新强校工程科研项目(GDOU2013050250);广东海洋大学人文社科专项课题(C14163)的资助

语种：中文

中文关键词：全球价值链;比较优势;外部失衡;附加值贸易

外文关键词：Global Value Chains; Comparative advantage; External imbalances; Trade in value- added

中文摘要：本文以WTO-OECD新发布的Ti VA统计数据为基础,从附加值贸易视角分析了中国的全球价值链分工地位与外贸失衡关系,并引入社会网络方法,构建了制造业出口、服务业出口和金融中介进口相对比较优势,考察了中国的国际分工比较优势与外部失衡的关系。结果表明:中国与贸易伙伴之间的附加值贸易余额很大程度上取决于他们的相对比较优势,双边附加值贸易余额与制造业相对出口比较优势、服务业相对出口比较优势显著正相关,与金融中介相对进口比较优势明显负相关。为了提升全球价值链地位,中国不仅需要持续的产业结构调整,也需要坚持推进市场化改革和制度创新,并进一步提高开放程度。

外文摘要：Based on the newly released statistical data of TiVA from WTO- OECD, this paper analyses the imbalance between China＇s position in Global Val- ue Chains and foreign trade from the perspective of trade in value- added. Then a relative comparative advantage between manufacturing export, service export and financial intennediation import was constructed introducing the social net- work method to examine the correlation between China＇s comparative advantage in international division and external imbalances. The results show that the bilater- al value- added trade balance between China and its trade partners are decided by their relative comparative advantages. There are notable positive correlations between the value added trade balance and relative comparative advantages in manufacturing export and service export, while there are obvious negative correla- tions between the value- added trade balance and relative comparative advantages in financial intermediate import. In order to enhance the status of China in Glob- al Value Chains, China needs to not only adjust its industrial structure continuous- ly, but also persist with the market- oriented reforms and institutional innova- tions, and further improve its openness.