文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：《中国图书馆分类法》(第5版)研究述评

英文题名：Research Review on Chinese Library Classification(CLC) (5th Edition)

作者：蒋鸿标[1];吴为民[1]

机构：[1]广东海洋大学图书馆,广东湛江524088

年份：2015

期号：4

起止页码：39

中文期刊名：图书馆建设

外文期刊名：Library Development

收录：CSTPCD、、国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库、北大核心2014、CSSCI2014_2016、北大核心、CSSCI

语种：中文

中文关键词：《中国图书馆分类法》;研究现状

外文关键词：Chinese Library Classification （CLC）; Research status

中文摘要：从期刊分布、作者分布、机构分布、地区分布、主题分布等方面调查《中国图书馆分类法》(简称《中图法》)(第5版)的研究现状表明,其存在介绍修订情况居多、探讨问题偏少、对问题理解和分析错误、将不规范编码当作规范编码、对复分加"0"问题一知半解等问题。因此,有关研究者要充分熟悉和掌握《中图法》的分类体系和编码方法,避免研究失误;《中图法》编委会要加强编制者的专业能力审查,并吸纳部分作者参与,彻底修正存在的问题,以维护《中图法》的权威性、科学性、实用性和稳定性。

外文摘要：There are some problems in studying Chinese Library Classification（CLC）（5th edition） from the distribution of the journal, the author, the organization, the region and the subject, such as introducing the revision in majority and exploring problems in minority, wrongly understanding and analyzing some questions, taking the non-standard encoding as the normative encoding, and having a little knowledge for the question of subdivision plus ＂0＂ by survey, and so on. Therefore, relevant researchers should be fully familiar with and master the classification system and encoding methods of CLC, and avoid mistakes; CLC editorial committee should strengthen the professional ability of the examinition, and attract some authors to involve, completely correct problems, in order to preserve the authority, the scientiflcity, the practicability and the stability of CLC.