文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：真理、合理与信念的评判

英文题名：Truth, Rationality and the Evaluation of Beliefs

作者：朱诗勇[1];李珍[2]

机构：[1]广东海洋大学思政部,广东湛江524088;[2]中山大学社会科学教育学院,广州510275

年份：2014

卷号：30

期号：4

起止页码：10

中文期刊名：自然辩证法研究

外文期刊名：Studies in Dialectics of Nature

收录：CSTPCD、、北大核心2011、CSSCI2014_2016、北大核心、CSSCI

基金：广东省哲学社会科学"十二五"规划2012年度学科共建项目"价值观的理性:准实在论的启示"(GD12XZX01)成果;广东海洋大学人文社科研究项目2012年度项目"准实在论研究:公共决策的一种哲学基础"(15)成果

语种：中文

中文关键词：真理;合理;信念评判

外文关键词：truth; rationality; evaluation of beliefs

中文摘要：当代哲学在信念的评判上处于两难境地,哲学家们要么陷入重建真理概念的泥潭中艰难自拔,要么选择抛弃真理原则的工具主义。信念评判问题发源于真理的概念直觉与信念的真理评判困难之间的矛盾,时至今日仍然悬而未决的主要原因是没有处理好真理和合理信念的关系。根据"真理"词项日常语言中的主流用法,坚持认识论的直觉,按照对象符合论理解真理概念,把认识对象看作要查明的世界或其中某类或某个事物的结构、属性、关系、功能、规律等,把真理看作与对象相符合的信念,理清真理与合理的辩证关系,既能坚持认识论的基本原则、又能恰当地评判现实的信念,它灵活地维护了信念的日常语义学理解,也达到了真理理论上的融贯。

外文摘要：The contemporary philosophy faces the dilemma on evaluation of beliefs： philosophers are either caught in a trap of rebuilding the concep- tion of truth, or take the choice of instrumentalism that abandons the principle of truth. The problem of evaluation of beliefs originates from the conflict between the conceptual intuition and the difficulty of evaluation of beliefs, and the main cause that it is still unsettled is that the relation betweens truth and rational beliefs is not properly handled. If we stick to our epistemological intuition according to the mainstream usage of ＇truth＇ in ordinary language, thus understand the conception of truth according to the theory of correspondence to objects, and take objects as the structure, attributes, relation, functions, or laws, etc., of the world or of a thing or things in it, which are to be found out, take truth as the belief that correspondent to these objects, and clarify the dialectical relationship between truth and rationality, we will not only be able to stick to the fundamental principle of epistemology, but also be able to evaluate practical beliefs properly, and the ordinary semantic understanding of beliefs will be maintained, and we＇ll get a coherent theory of truth.