文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：不同甘蔗品种锤度与糖分的关系

英文题名：Relationships Between Brix and Sugar Content in Different Varieties of Sugarcane

作者：王季槐[1];陈庄[2];何春林[1];罗桥顺[1];丘振强[1];李弈海[1];刘玉山[1];杨海燕[1];邹相优[1];梁秋生[1]

机构：[1]湛江海洋大学农学院,广东湛江524088;[2]湛江海洋大学学报编辑部,广东湛江524025

年份：2003

卷号：23

期号：4

起止页码：62

中文期刊名：湛江海洋大学学报

外文期刊名：Journal of Zhanjiang Ocean University

收录：CSTPCD

基金：广东省教育厅自然科学研究项目 (2 0 0 16 1) ;湛江市科技局科技攻关项目 (2 0 0 2 0 4 7)

语种：中文

中文关键词：甘蔗;锤度;糖分;模型;品种

外文关键词：sugarcane; brix; sugar content ; model

中文摘要：使用大田实验数据和实验室数据建立了实验室锤度和田间锤度与甘蔗糖分关系的数学模型。统计分析表明 ,实验室锤度、田间锤度与糖分间均存在显著的线性关系 ,并且实验室锤度———糖分关系与大田锤度———糖分关系存在显著性 (α =0 .0 5 )差异 ;而不同甘蔗品种间的田间锤度———糖分关系无显著性差异 (α =0 .0 5 )。故不同的取样方法应使用不同的方程来估计甘蔗糖分 ;而不同甘蔗品种间田间锤度———糖分关系可用同一模型来描述。对三个供试甘蔗品种应用该模型进行实测验证 ,实测与预测值的相对误差均在 7%以内。

外文摘要：In this article, mathematical models describing the relationships between brix obtained in field or laboratory and sugar content have been built based on the experimental data from the field and laboratory. There are, in statistic sense, significant linear relationships between (field and laboratory) brix and sugar content in sugarcane. And there is a significant difference between the relationship of field brix sugar content and the one of laboratory brix sugar content (at significant level 0.05); while there is no significant difference among the relationships between field brix sugar content in different varieties of sugarcane. Therefore, different mathematical equations should be applied to describe the relationships between brix and sugar content in sugarcane when different methods are used for taking samples (brix from field or laboratory; while the same equation may be applied to describe the relationships between field brix and sugar content in different varieties of sugarcane. The equation has been validated using the data of field brix and sugar content in the three varieties of sugarcane. The results have shown that the relative errors between the values measured and the ones estimated by the equation are within 7%.