文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：十四至十九世纪家产继承制的中西比较

英文题名：A Comparison of the Chinese and Western Systems of the Inheritance of Family Property from the Fourteenth to the Nineteenth Centuries

作者：龙登高[1];赵亮[2];陈月圆[3]

机构：[1]清华大学社会科学学院,北京100084;[2]广东海洋大学经济学院,湛江524088;[3]北京师范大学经济与工商管理学院,北京100875

年份：2024

期号：1

起止页码：183

中文期刊名：中国社会科学

外文期刊名：Social Sciences in China

收录：北大核心2023、CSTPCD、、国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库、CSSCI2023_2024、北大核心、社科基金资助期刊、CSSCI

语种：中文

中文关键词：分家析产;长子继承;产权制度;经济主体;中西比较

中文摘要：明清中国普遍的诸子均分制与同时期西欧较多的长子继承制,其差异源自中西土地产权与经济主体特性的不同。明清多层次的土地产权与多样化的交易形式,以及具有较强生命力的独立个体家庭农庄,成为分家析产赖以运行且长期延续的制度保障。西欧庄园产权的身份性及整体性则使财产继承与身份继承不可分割,农牧结合型庄园的经营方式与自成一体的生产生活秩序强化了其整体性,长子继承成为合乎逻辑和具有适应性的制度选择。家产继承制度对中西经济模式与发展方向都产生了影响。西欧的长子继承制本身并不具备制度优势,而是间接地在原有体制之外催生出新的异质因素,进而推动制度变革,长子继承制自身随之衰落;中国的诸子均分制则与个体家庭农庄经营相互强化,在维系传统社会稳定的同时也抑制了变革。

外文摘要：The difference between the system of equal shares for all sons(partible inheritance),which was prevalent in Ming and Qing China,and primogeniture,which was more common in Western Europe during the same period,stems from the difference in the characteristics of land ownership and economic agents between China and the West.The multi-layered property rights to land and diversified forms of transaction in the Ming and Qing dynasties,as well as the strong vitality of individual family holdings,became the institutional guarantee for the operation and long-term continuation of the division of the family and partition of property.The status and holistic nature of the property rights of the Western European manor rendered the inheritance of property and status inseparable;the management and self-contained mode of production and life of combined agricultural and pastoral holdings made the manor more holistic,so that the eldest son's inheritance became a logical and adaptable institutional choice.Their systems of family inheritance had an impact on both Chinese and Western economic modes and developmental directions.Western European primogeniture did not have institutional advantages in itself,but indirectly gave rise to new heterogeneous factors outside the original system.These led to institutional change,resulting in the decline of primogeniture.In China,the system of equal shares for all sons and individual family holdings reinforced each other,maintaining the stability of traditional society while at the same time inhibiting change.