文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：判断力的来源及作用——论康德哲学两大领域的过渡

英文题名：Source and role of Judgement: Discussion About the Transition of the Two Domains of Kant’s Philosophy

作者：王丹[1]

机构：[1]广东海洋大学文学院,广东湛江524088

年份：2009

卷号：29

期号：5

起止页码：43

中文期刊名：广东海洋大学学报

外文期刊名：Journal of Guangdong Ocean University

收录：CSTPCD

语种：中文

中文关键词：判断力;悟性;理性;合目的性

外文关键词：judgement; perception; rationality; Co-purpose.

中文摘要：康德哲学中悟性和理性、自然和自由两大领域间鸿沟的来源以及作为沟通两大领域的判断力的产生,可以从两个方面进行分析:1)康德在《判断力批判》导论的结尾为他的哲学结构所列的那张表完整地表达了康德的哲学观点:主体运用自己的活动机能按照先验诸原理为对象立法,并最终获得了对于对象的知识,而人的心灵机能除了认识的机能(悟性)和欲求的机能(理性)之外,还有能联结这二者的愉快或不快的情感机能(判断力);2)从哲学一般的领域(即哲学的对象)中,也可以分析出两大领域间鸿沟的来源及判断力的产生。

外文摘要：According to Kant＇s view, his Critique of Pure Reason and Critique of Practical Reason resulted in the big gap between perception and rationality, between nature and liberty, however, Critique of Judgement was created as a bridge on the gap. By two aspects, we can analyse the questions on how the big gap formed and how the judgement could make. First, Kant＇s philosophical point was expressed completely at the end of the preface of Critique of Judgement where he made a form for his philosophical structure. The subjective body utilizes own active function to legislate for the object according to the prior various principles, and has obtained finally the object knowledge. Besides cognitive function （perception） and desire function （rationality）, Human mental function includes emotion function to connect their happiness and unhappiness. The emotion function was considered as judgement by Kant. Second, from general philosophical domain （i.e. philosophy object）, we may also analyze the origin of the gap between the two big domains and the production ofjudgrnent.