文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：李悝撰《法经》质疑补证

英文题名：Doubt and Supplemental Argumentation about Li Ku's Writing of“Fa Jing”

作者：廖宗麟[1]

机构：[1]广东海洋大学法学院,广东湛江524025

年份：2006

卷号：26

期号：1

起止页码：79

中文期刊名：河池学院学报

外文期刊名：Journal of Hechi University

收录：人大复印报刊资料、、国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库

语种：中文

中文关键词：李悝;《法经》;中国法制史;疑案

外文关键词：Li Kui; ＂Fa Jing＂ ; Chinese Legal History; doubtful case

中文摘要：李悝是否曾撰《法经》一事,是中国法制史上的一件疑案。曾有学者从考证此事不见于秦汉史籍记载,推断李悝撰《法经》的说法最早可能出于南朝时,并认为其真实性已受到学术界的普遍质疑。而从《法经》所谓的“王者之政,莫急于盗贼”,严重地违背了李悝所处战国时期的实际情况；从春秋到战国的诸多政治家虽然对法律制度有很深的研究,但都没有人留下类似《法经》的专门法律著作；以及《法经》“诸法合体,民刑不分”的编著体例,与春秋战国到秦朝所制订和实施的法律制度“诸法异体,民刑分离”的编著体例全然不同等情况看来,李悝是否曾撰《法经》,是一个值得怀疑的问题。

外文摘要：Whether Li Kui ever wrote ＂Fa Jing＂ , is a doubtful as in Chinese legal history. Scholars once concluded that the view that Li Kui wrote ＂Fa ring＂ probably came out in Nan Dynasty, because they and testified that it was not recorded in historical materials of Qin Dynasty and Han Dynasty. And they thought that its authenticity has been doubted widely by academic circles. ＂Nothing is important than to penalize theft and robbery for dominator＇ s governance＂ said by ＂Fa Jing＂ , seriously breaches the actual condition of the period of Ularring states lived in by Li Kui; although many politicians from Spring and Autumn to warring states perid did research for legal system profoundly, no one left the special legal bookmaking like ＂Fa ,ling＂ ; And ＂All laws together, civil law and criminal law not divided＂ is the compilatory style of ＂＂ Fa Jing＂ , totally different from that of legal systems constituted and executed from Spring and Autumn period and warring states pericd to Qin Dynasty,whose was ＂All laws separated, civil law and criminal law divided＂. Therefore, whether Li Kui ever wrote ＂Fa Jing＂ is a question worthy of doubting.