文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：准实在论的态度逻辑

英文题名：The Quasi-realist Logic of Attitudes

作者：朱诗勇[1]

机构：[1]广东海洋大学马克思主义学院

年份：2017

卷号：8

期号：5

起止页码：117

中文期刊名：哲学分析

外文期刊名：Philosophical Analysis

收录：国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库、CSSCI_E2017_2018、CSSCI

基金：国家社科基金2015年第三批后期资助项目"准实在论研究"(项目编号:15FZX031)阶段性成果;广东省哲学社会科学"十二五"规划2012年度学科共建项目"价值观的理性:准实在论的启示"(项目编号:GD12XZX01)成果;广东海洋大学2012年度人文社科校级项目"准实在论研究:公共决策的一种哲学基础"成果

语种：中文

中文关键词：道德命题;态度;逻辑;真理;真值

外文关键词：moral proposition;attitude;logic;truth;truth value

中文摘要：准实在论把道德命题看作态度的表达并发展出道德语言的逻辑形式和态度推理的有效性说明。就准实在论态度逻辑总体来说,其真理紧缩论混淆了真理和真值,但有益于纠正真值实在论、理解推理有效性;其推理有效性说明已经触及一致性的逻辑有效性本质,因此对其混淆态度矛盾与逻辑矛盾的批评并未切中其要害。准实在论语用学片面理解道德判断的功能,混淆道德命题、态度描述命题和态度表达语句;通过把道德范畴看作渗透价值、把道德命题看作以此为基础的描述,道德命题语义学属性的确是反实在论的,但仍可以按紧缩论解释的逻辑真说明其推理有效性。

外文摘要：Quasi-realism takes moral propositions as expressing attitudes,and has developed logical form of moral languages and the interpretation of the validity of inference of them.On the whole,quasi-realism's deflationary theory of truth confuses truth with truth value,but its helps to correct realism of truth value and understand the validity of inference; its interpretation of the validity of inference has touched the nature of logic validity,so those criticisms miss the mark that quasi-realism confused attitudinal conflicts with logical ones.Quasi-realism has a one-sided understanding of the function of moral propositions.It confused moral propositions with propositions of attitude description and sentences for attitude expression.Taking moral categories as loading values and moral propositions as descriptions on that logical base,the semantic attribution of moral proposition is really anti-realistic,but their validity of inference can be interpreted by the deflationary theory of truth.