文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：不同收粪方法对测定畜禽营养物质消化率的影响

英文题名：Effects of Different Livestock Feces Collection Method on Digestibility (or Metabolic Rate)

作者：陈广信[1];曹赞[1];高振华[1]

机构：[1]广东海洋大学农学院,广东湛江524088

年份：2014

卷号：30

期号：2

起止页码：22

中文期刊名：中国农学通报

外文期刊名：Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin

收录：CSTPCD、、CSCD_E2013_2014、CSCD

基金：广东海洋大学教育教学改革项目"研究生教育与本科教育协调发展的研究"(XJG201153)

语种：中文

中文关键词：全收粪法;指示剂法;消化率;AIA;Cr2;O3

外文关键词：Total Feces Collection Method; Indicator Method; digestibility; AIA; Cr2 O3

中文摘要：为确定不同收粪方法对畜禽营养物质消化率(或代谢率)的影响。本研究通过对前人不同收粪方法和粪便不同处理方法的比较分析,探讨不同方法的优势与不足,明确不同方法间的联系与不同,为消化代谢试验的精确性提供依据。结果表明:全收粪法能准确的测定畜禽消化率,但应用起来受到诸多条件限制,为简化全收粪法人们采用了指示剂法;指示剂法能大大缩小工作量,应用起来简洁方便,但测定结果有一定偏差。

外文摘要：In order to confirm the effects of different feces collection methods on nutrients digestibility（or metabolic rate） of the livestock, the study discussed the advantages and disadvantages of different methods, also realized the relations and differences among them by comparing and analyzing the different feces collection methods and feces treatment methods of the predecessors. The study aimed to provide evidence for the accuracy of digestion and metabolism trials. The results showed that： total feces collection method could accurately assay the digestibility of livestock, but it was limited by many prerequisites. In order to simplify total fecal collection, people used indicator method. Indicator method could reduce the workload greatly, and it was easy to use, however, the results had some deviations.