文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：图书馆学研究对象可以飘忽不定吗——对“可获得性论”的质疑

英文题名：Can the Subjects Investigated of the Library Science Be Uncertain?--Question the "Availability Theory"

作者：孙长虹[1]

机构：[1]广东海洋大学图书馆,广东湛江524088

年份：2006

卷号：16

期号：5

起止页码：8

中文期刊名：科技情报开发与经济

外文期刊名：Sci-Tech Information Development & Economy

语种：中文

中文关键词：图书馆学;研究对象;可获得性;知识单元

外文关键词：library science; subject invested; availability; knowledge unit

中文摘要：根据梁灿兴先生在《可获得性论的文献及相关概念》和《可获得性论的知识自由和知识共享阐释——重新定义可获得性论》两篇文章中对图书馆学研究对象给出不同的答案,认为这本身就是自我否定,“是可获得性”不能成为图书馆学研究对象的原因之一。同时,知识单元也不是图书馆编目工作的范围,因而这种预测脱离图书馆实际。

外文摘要：According to the different answers about the investigated subjects of the library science of Mr. LIANG Canxing in his papers of 〈The Literature and Relevant Concepts of the Availability Theory 〉 and 〈The Explanation of the Knowledge Freedom and Knowledge Sharing of the Availability Theory the Redefinition of the Availability Theory〉, this paper holds that the two answers themselves are self-negation, and it is one of the reasons why the ＂availability＂ can＇t become the subject investigated of the library science, and points out that the knowledge unit doesn＇t belong to the scope of library＇ s cataloging work, so this kind of estimation id divorced from library＇ s reality.