文献类型：期刊文献

英文题名：International research collaboration: An emerging domain of innovation studies?

作者：Chen, Kaihua[1,4];Zhang, Yi[2];Fu, Xiaolan[3]

机构：[1]Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Sci & Dev, Beijing, Peoples R China;[2]Guangdong Ocean Univ, Sch Management, Zhanjiang, Peoples R China;[3]Univ Oxford, Dept Int Dev, 3 Mansfield Rd, Oxford OX1 3TB, England;[4]Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Publ Policy & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China

年份：2019

卷号：48

期号：1

起止页码：149

外文期刊名：RESEARCH POLICY

收录：SSCI(收录号：WOS:000454466400012)、、EI(收录号：20183405726961)、Scopus(收录号：2-s2.0-85051723959)、WOS

基金：We are grateful for comments from seminar participants at the University of Oxford and Chinese Academy of Sciences. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant numbers 71874179; 71804028; 71471170), the Youth Project of Philosophy and Social Sciences Research, Ministry of Education of China (Grant number 18YJC630251), the Beijing Cairncross Foundation (Grant number CF-021), and the China Youth Innovation Promotion Association (Grant number 2015131).

语种：英文

外文关键词：International research collaboration; Evolution and future research agenda; Co-citation network analysis; Main path analysis; Bibliographic coupling analysis

外文摘要：International research collaboration (IRC) has been increasingly important as an emerging area of innovation studies. This study reviews the intellectual base, main research trajectories and intellectual communities of the IRC research domain over the period 1957-2015. It integrates qualitative review and three quantitative analyses including co-citation network analysis, main path analysis and bibliographic coupling analysis. The results show that the IRC research has gone through three phases, namely, "emergence" (1957-1991), "fermentation" (1992-2005) and "take-off" (2006-2015) phases. The co-citation network analysis confirms that the IRC research field has been developed under the influence of two pioneering studies related to bibliometrics research. The main research trajectories in IRC studies over the three development phases and over the whole period are identified based on the main path analysis, which shows that co-authorship analysis is the main research method in IRC studies. A bibliographic coupling analysis suggests that the whole IRC research domain can be classified into five distinct intellectual areas: drivers of IRC, IRC patterns, IRC effects, IRC networks and IRC measurement. Seven topics for future research are also identified.